Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training (MOET) expects nearly 20 different university admission methods to be applied in 2025. However, the ministry advises institutions not to adopt an excessive number of methods, which could confuse applicants.
In a draft guide for university and college admissions, the ministry released a list of official admission methods, identified by code, as follows:
100 – Admission based on results of the national high school graduation exam
200 – Admission based on high school academic records (transcripts)
301 – Direct admission according to regulations stated in Article 8 of the Admissions Policy
401 – Admission based on aptitude or competency tests organized by the training institution
402 – Admission based on results of aptitude or competency tests organized by external units
403 – Admission based on academic exams organized by the institution itself
404 – Admission based on academic exam results from other institutions
405 – Combination of high school graduation exam results and aptitude test scores
406 – Combination of high school transcripts and aptitude test scores
407 – Combination of high school graduation exam results and high school transcripts
409 – Combination of high school graduation exam results and international certificates
410 – Combination of high school transcripts and international certificates
411 – Admission for students graduating from foreign high schools
413 – Combination of high school graduation exam results and interview
414 – Combination of high school transcripts and interview
415 – Admission based on SAT or other eligible international certificates
500 – Other admission methods
Earlier, MOET released statistics on admission results for 2024 by method. Analysis revealed that over 80% of successful candidates were admitted via national high school graduation exam results and high school transcripts. Of these, more than 52% were admitted through graduation exam scores, while nearly 28% gained admission via academic records.
The remaining candidates were admitted through competency or aptitude tests (3.36%); a combination of direct admission through institutional plans (1.96%); and other methods across 12 different admission approaches (13.33%).
A representative from MOET emphasized that the use of too many admission methods can create information overload for applicants. In reality, some methods receive few or no applicants, making them inefficient.
Given this, the ministry recommends that universities reconsider and eliminate ineffective methods. It also urges institutions to ensure fairness across admission methods by avoiding separate quotas for each method or subject combination and by using equivalent scoring systems to determine eligibility.
Thuy Nga